Becoming unmanned seems like an idea that is very intriguing in the example of feminism. Feminism stands for the equality of rights to women as well as men. But as the autonomous technology joins the warfare activities isn’t just a good a idea for removing gender from the equation as a whole, but it would also declare our senses of what is powerful useless since it wont be in action any more. imagining warfare would be completely different, but even more dangerous than ever before due to the elevated since of technology that removes our dated ideas of who is capable and who isn’t. what would only matter will only how to operate these new technologies. it be a drone for example, what matter is the command given to the drone or the needed code to actually operate and send the drone, so it will cancel the gender part of things and only the information about the object in questions is the only thing that is valuable. also you can see that in the powerful exoskeletons that they can use in warfare, it gives those who use it a different sense of humanity or the limits of their gender almost from zero to a million difference in strength and other attributes. a woman can lift things what a typical masculine man can never lift in the entirety of his life, then this will a give power a new sense of meaning. those who can use this technology better than any other person, whether male or female, will be the strongest not the one which is higher in the normal hierarchies, but those who are higher in the new technological hierarchy. this autonomous technology will dismantle all that we have know about human biology and we might be able to create new ones that replace the ambiguity of our biological structures, where we can create ones that we can but no roles on genders and value those who can use that new technology.

in last week’s reading, the interviews mentioned that some patients felt hacked because the pacemaker didn’t make them feel as normal as they imagined it would be. this disability is crippling to the patients, and they were told that the pacemakers would make there life’s normal not just sustained, which i get why they would feel hacked. one of the patients described there level of activity in general as very high paced and the pacemaker couldn’t keep up with his level of original level of activity. another patient felt as the pacemaker level of activity couldn’t make his heart rate rise because it didn’t recognize the level of activity he was performing. i think because of how small the object is and how it doesn’t really affect small parts of their activity, these patients didn’t recognize that they had a disability in the first place, as for example a person who is physically disabled would feel constantly that he disable, because he can easily recognize it very fast, and always be conscious about it and understand how he should attend to it. for a person with a pacemaker it is harder to recognize your disability because everything else is in tact nothing to be conscious about or to recognize in non fatal position to their own disability.

As we watched the movie, I didn’t think much of it because it wasn’t a good movie. At the end of the movie, I released something about the current theme of why we create in general or at least the process that we go through. In the beginning, we create because of a certain need(for example, in the movie golem was created for the need of protection from the adversaries. the creation begins and works successfully; some might even call too successful to be true. however, like anything we create for Example a machine it can run through some bugs here and there, but in the case of golem killing just for personal reasons rather than protection. In A machine if the bug isn’t solved the machine doesn’t work, but in some cases, the machine could explode and create various problems away from the actual intentions of the machines in the first place. in golem, he started killing everyone regardless of the actual point, which is protection. We can see this case for AI, for example, some people are fascinated about how much it is better than humans and successfully it is at doing complex processes. I dont pay attention to history we might be doom to repeat it. maybe AI is the future but don’t we need regulations first, or understanding how it works or even how fast to can go, which is the same plot of the movie, the mother didn’t understand or comprehend the damage it can cause to the people around her first, but took a leap that could have been unnecessary at all in the first place.

On the course of history, humans have created tools and objects to ease their way of life, but why create to replace others? Humans created silk machines that can net silk more efficient and better than humans that it drove humans out of netting silk themselves. The need to evolve is important, so humans create what makes their creative process go into other fields to also create other tools and automate. and the question still stands why create to replace other humans? Perhaps greed as some would say. but i think more importantly it is the need to recreate what god can create. The need to be godly and virtues as god made humans seek ultimate power. god created us, could control us, and could terminate us. New Automate has the same features for us. though we mightn’t seem to have full control over it, but still it feels like it is our slave. It does whatever we want whenever we want it to happen, which fulfills the purpose of an automate but not really humanly possible. We keep looking forward might happen. what we could create in the future. maybe we could become like gods. maybe they would destroy us just like Zeus did to his father. the long to be god like is still pending, yet very anticipated from the human kind in the future.